The 1st PPAVI Higher Education Research and Vocational Conference 2026

Submission Details

Accepted PPAVI-2026-906DCB32 / Oral
Your abstract is accepted and payment is complete.

Proceedings manuscript

Status: Submitted

Submission Information

Submitted
08 Oct 2026, 18:18 WIB
Presentation Type
Oral
Presentation Fee
Registration Fee: Presenter Oral Onsite
Symposium
Symposium on Business Transformation, Social Innovation, Humanities, and Sustainable Economy
Track
Social Innovation, Humanities, and Institutional Transformation
Topic
Social Innovation and Community Empowerment
Authors
Christy Mahendra
Affiliation
Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Komputer Yos Sudarso
Submission Payment
Paid

Title and Abstract

English

Title

Artificial Intelligence Ethics and Human Dignity: A Philosophical Synthesis for Responsible Governance

Abstract

Artificial intelligence (AI) is increasingly used in decisions affecting healthcare, education, the legal system, and sustainability, raising questions about human dignity, moral agency, and accountability. This conceptual study synthesizes 20 peer-reviewed studies to develop a philosophical perspective on responsible AI governance. It draws on Kantian ethics, virtue ethics, Islamic metaphysics, and contemporary critical theory to examine AI’s status as a moral agent and the implications of AI use for human-centered governance. The synthesis highlights a recurring tension between technological determinism and the need to keep human welfare and responsibility central. It suggests that current AI systems should be treated as tools rather than autonomous moral agents, with accountability resting on the people and institutions that design, deploy, and oversee them. The paper proposes an interdisciplinary governance framework that integrates human dignity, transparency, accountability, and inclusivity throughout the AI lifecycle. By connecting ethical principles with institutional and sectoral challenges, this framework offers guidance for aligning AI development and use with human welfare and social justice.

Keywords

ethics, artificial intelligence, human dignity, governance, Kantian philosophy

Bahasa Indonesia

Judul

Etika Kecerdasan Artifisial dan Martabat Manusia: Sintesis Filosofis untuk Tata Kelola yang Bertanggung Jawab

Abstrak

Kecerdasan Artifisial (AI) semakin banyak digunakan dalam keputusan yang mempengaruhi kesehatan, pendidikan, sistem hukum, dan keberlanjutan, yang menimbulkan pertanyaan tentang martabat manusia, agensi moral, dan akuntabilitas. Studi konseptual ini mensintesis 20 studi yang telah ditinjau sejawat untuk mengembangkan perspektif filosofis tentang tata kelola AI yang bertanggung jawab. Ini mengacu pada etika Kantian, etika kebajikan, metafisika Islam, dan teori kritis kontemporer untuk memeriksa status AI sebagai agen moral dan implikasi penggunaan AI untuk tata kelola yang berpusat pada manusia. Sintesis ini menyoroti ketegangan yang berulang antara determinisme teknologi dan kebutuhan untuk menjaga kesejahteraan dan tanggung jawab manusia tetap menjadi pusat. Ini menyarankan bahwa sistem AI saat ini harus diperlakukan sebagai alat daripada agen moral otonom, dengan akuntabilitas yang terletak pada orang dan institusi yang merancang, menerapkan, dan mengawasi mereka. Makalah ini mengusulkan kerangka tata kelola interdisipliner yang mengintegrasikan martabat manusia, transparansi, akuntabilitas, dan inklusivitas sepanjang siklus hidup AI. Dengan menghubungkan prinsip-prinsip etika dengan tantangan institusional dan sektoral, kerangka ini menawarkan panduan untuk menyelaraskan pengembangan dan penggunaan AI dengan kesejahteraan manusia dan keadilan sosial.

Kata kunci

etika, kecerdasan artifisial, martabat manusia, tata kelola, filosofi Kantian

Submitted Materials

Presentation File: Download presentation

Full Paper: View manuscript

Review / Editorial Notes and Discussion

Use this thread for submission questions, corrections, and committee-author communication.

Committee: Romanus Edy Prabowo 08 Oct 2026, 21:17 WIB
To strengthen the abstract’s methodological clarity, please add the publication period, databases or sources searched, and criteria used to select the 20 studies. Include these only if they accurately describe the review process.

Please make sure if this presentation is a single author talk.